As undiscutable arguments (meaning objective, even axiomatic arguments), we can state about the book completeness: does it solve the problem for which he was stating? Does it solve it entirely or still letting some shadows zones? We should also ask about its lack of research when thinking about incomplete arguments or mis-understanding. ## Complements - [202106122339 Don't worry about slipbox's completeness](202106122339%20Don't%20worry%20about%20slipbox's%20completeness.md) --- *From: [How To Read A Book, The Classic Guide To Intelligent Reading - Mortimer J. Adler, Charles Van Doren](How%20To%20Read%20A%20Book,%20The%20Classic%20Guide%20To%20Intelligent%20Reading%20-%20Mortimer%20J.%20Adler,%20Charles%20Van%20Doren.md)*